Search for: "Concerned Members v. District Court"
Results 81 - 100
of 6,319
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2017, 8:10 am
Lanier, Nos. 16-6655/6657.The Supreme Court's decision in Remmer v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
In 1927, the Supreme Court held in McGrain v. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
Addressing the concern that allowing both classes to proceed simultaneously would confuse class members, the Court held that district courts "should be able to 'work[] out an adequate notice in this type of case.'" [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 11:27 am
The Garcia appellants and Palmer petitioners raise a host of claims of error, including most prominently whether the decision of a one-judge district court in a Section 2 case can divest a three-judge court of its ability to weigh in on a constitutional claim concerning the same district. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 2:14 pm
In Mazza v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
The District Court observed that in Green v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 4:15 am
Subsequently, it "received over 40 phone calls and 50 emails or handwritten letters, daily, from concerned staff, parents, and community members. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 10:29 am
Supreme Court issued its opinion in The Standard Fire Insurance Company v. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 5:17 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed a lawsuit brought by the U.S. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:25 am
Concerning the so-called “Blue Wall of Silence”Diesel v Town of Lewisboro, CA2, 232 F.3d 92While some might allege that there is a "blue wall of silence"* encouraged by certain individuals involved in law enforcement, rarely does one find a court decision that specifically addresses the concept.Not so in the Diesel case. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:25 pm
The court then turns to United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
Supreme Court granted the objectors' cert. petition in Frank v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
Supreme Court granted the objectors' cert. petition in Frank v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 7:28 pm
The North Carolina Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 1:45 am
It was neither provided nor endorsed by the Mateszalka District Court, which is issuing judicial authority. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:38 am
The District Courts of Appeal have recently been grappling with the thorny issues resulting from the Court's decision to decertify the class, but allow class members to take advantage of 8 findings made by the Engle jury by way of res judicata. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 7:54 am
On February 16, 2010, Northern District Judge Claudia Wilken certified a National and California class of approximately 556,639 owners of Superior or Lennox brand single-pane sealed glass front fireplaces in Keilholtz v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 11:40 am
Central District Judge Michael W. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 8:07 am
Supreme Court’s decision Rutherford Food Corp. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 12:30 pm
* Although Union Leader argued that the School District"infringed his right to engage in speech protected by the First Amendment" the Circuit Court, citing Garcetti v. [read post]
