Search for: "Condon v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 971
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2013, 8:57 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)A three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit this week affirmed a lower court's dismissal of a motion to dismiss a class-action invasion of privacy suit brought against San Francisco-based Google, Inc., concerning Street View.In its 35-page decision in Joffe, et al. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 7:44 am
The answer is no.The case is Palma v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 5:05 am
" Citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d 1044, the Appellate Division explained that "[T]he substantial evidence standard is a minimal standard" that is "less than a preponderance of the evidence, and demands only that a given inference is reasonable and plausible, not necessarily the most probable. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 5:05 am
" Citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d 1044, the Appellate Division explained that "[T]he substantial evidence standard is a minimal standard" that is "less than a preponderance of the evidence, and demands only that a given inference is reasonable and plausible, not necessarily the most probable. [read post]
5 May 2007, 4:49 pm
Subsequent to the trial court's response to the jury note, the State filed a motion to reconsider. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 1:52 pm
By Condon A. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:00 am
Condon, and Burnet v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 9:13 am
Condon, and Burnet v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:34 am
In the alternative, the claimant sought condonation for late notice. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 9:13 am
Kennedy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 6:30 am
Condon. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 11:30 am
(b); see People v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 2:18 am
Whether a conclusory allegation that a cabinet-level officer or other high-ranking official knew of, condoned, or agreed to subject a plaintiff to allegedly unconstitutional acts purportedly committed by subordinate officials is sufficient to state individual-capacity claims against those officials under Bivens.2. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 4:44 am
In Hivley v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 4:44 am
In Hivley v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 9:06 pm
Loving v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 10:00 am
Did the Appellate Division, First, Department, condone a religious leader's sexual misconduct in Marmelstein v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 4:25 am
PERB had found the Union had supported or condoned two “sick-outs. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:15 am
Or not....On December 10, the Beastie Boys filed an Answer and asserted counterclaims including copyright infringement, trade mark infringement, unfair competition, and misappropriation of right of publicity (under California state law). [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 4:57 am
Condon, 2020 Mass. [read post]
