Search for: "Cone v. the Florida Bar"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2013, 4:14 pm
Cone Memorial Hospital v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:16 am
OF CENTRAL FLORIDA, AS ASSIGNEE OF CARMELO GONZALEZ AND VICTORIA GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 8:21 am
It cited Cone v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 8:41 am
Cone v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:38 am
State, the Florida Supreme Court found imposition of the death penalty to be disproportionate. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:13 am
Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 6:47 pm
LEXIS 2 (Fl 1/6/2011) Relief denied on claims that “(1) trial counsel was ineffective for failing to prepare a penalty phase mitigation witness; (2) trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate, question and remove a juror from the jury panel; (3) trial counsel was ineffective for failing to properly argue the applicability of the statutory age mitigator; (4) Florida‘s lethal injection protocols are unconstitutional; (5) section 945.10, Florida Statutes… [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 7:04 pm
Bar Ass’n, 2010 Ky. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 5:49 am
Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm
Myers v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Hall, No. 09–5731 In a capital habeas matter, the petition for certiorari is granted and the court of appeals' order is vacated and remanded where the court of appeals incorrectly held that the habeas petition, which claimed that petitioner was denied discovery into the issue of whether there had been improper communications between the judge and jury, was procedurally barred based on an insufficient record, contrary to Cone v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Hall, No. 09–5731 In a capital habeas matter, the petition for certiorari is granted and the court of appeals' order is vacated and remanded where the court of appeals incorrectly held that the habeas petition, which claimed that petitioner was denied discovery into the issue of whether there had been improper communications between the judge and jury, was procedurally barred based on an insufficient record, contrary to Cone v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:10 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:57 am
Liebeck v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:57 am
Liebeck v. [read post]
