Search for: "Congo v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2011, 3:48 am by traceydennis
Regina (Lumba (Congo)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Same v Same (No 2); Regina (Mighty (Jamaica)) v Same; [On appeal from Regina (WL (Congo)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department] [2011] UKSC 12;;  [2011] WLR (D)  100  ”The unlawful exercise by the Secretary of State of the power to detain foreign national prisoners gave rise to a private law action for the… [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 3:18 am by sally
JD (Congo) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Public Law Project intervening); WN (The Gambia) v Same; ES (Iran) v Same; MR (Bangladesh) v Same [2012] EWCA Civ 327; [2012] WLR (D) 85 “Where a claimant who had succeeded before the First-tier Tribunal but failed in the Upper Tribunal sought permission to appeal from the Upper Tribunal, not on the ground of an important point of principle or practice, but for some other compelling… [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Congo (France) International Extradition Treaty with the United States (The extradition treaty applicable to Congo was originally signed with France.) [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 6:00 am
Originating in 2005, Kensington International Limited v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 12:00 am by Samantha Knights, Matrix.
The long awaited judgment of the nine member panel in the case previously referred to as WL (Congo) and KM (Jamaica) (see case preview) was handed down on 23 March 2011. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 9:29 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include:The ICJ’s first determination of war reparations: Practical challenges and legal solutions Introduced by Béatrice Bonafé Alice Ollino, Causality in the law of State responsibility: Considerations on the Congo v Uganda case Alessandro Bufalini, Remarks on the role of equity in determining war reparations before the International Court of Justice Bernardo Mageste, War reparations as a financial burden on the responsible State:… [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 6:14 am
There is only one appeal scheduled in the Supreme Court this week: WL Congo 1 and 2 & anr v Secretary of State for the Home Department and KM (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 10:24 am
On January 25, 2007, the United States Court of AppealS for the Ninth Circuit decided in the matter Af-Cap, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 1:21 pm
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Sprecher Grier Halberstam Llp & Anor v Walsh [2008] EWCA Civ 1324 (03 December 2008) DB, R (on the application of) v Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust [2008] EWCA Civ 1354 (03 December 2008) BK ( Democratic Republic of Congo) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 1322 (03 December [...] [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 9:14 am
s denial of the Rule 60(b) motion of the Democratic Republic of Congo for relief from a default judgment and remanded for further proceedings on the merits in FG Hemisphere Associates, LLC v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:38 am
Congo), Compensation Owed by the Democratic Republic of the Congo to the Republic of Guinea (I.C.J.), with introductory note by Chiara Giorgetti Appellate Body Report, United States - Measures Affecting the Production and Sale of Clove Cigarettes (WTO), with introductory note by Tania Voon Charter of the Financial Stability Board, with introductory note by Christopher J. [read post]
6 Jan 2007, 8:13 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted the summary reversal of a garnishment order in the matter FG Hemisphere Associates LLC v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:00 am by Isabel McArdle
JD (Congo)  and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Public Law Project [2012] EWCA Civ 327 The Court of Appeal has considered the test for the second stage of appeal in immigration cases, when someone wishes to appeal from the Upper Tribunal to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:29 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
By a majority  (Lords Phillips, Brown and Rodger dissenting), the court held that the fact that the appellants would have lawfully been detained in any event did not affect the Secretary of State’s liability in false imprisonment. [read post]