Search for: "Conklin v. Cohen"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2024, 5:45 am
Defendant was not discharged for cause, nor did it charge legal fees for any work associated with the motion practice ensuing from the supplemental disclosures (see Decolator, Cohen & DiPrisco v Lysaght, Lysaght & Kramer, 304 AD2d 86, 91 [1st Dept 2003]). [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 4:01 am
If the defendant satisfies that burden, the burden then shifts to the plaintiff to rebut the defendant’s prima facie showing (see Montero v Cohen, 104 AD3d 654, 655 [2013]; cf. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:25 am
Defendant was not discharged for cause, nor did it charge legal fees for any work associated with the motion practice ensuing from the supplemental disclosures (see Decolator, Cohen & DiPrisco v Lysaght, Lysaght & Kramer, 304 AD2d 86, 91 [1st Dept 2003]). [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 2:54 pm
Flood & Conklin Mfg. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:23 pm
As the Supreme Court observed in Conklin v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am
Human Dignity, Journal of Hate Studies, Vol. 16(1) (2020): 1–11, Raphael Cohen-Almagor, University of Hull. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
Deposition2002-10-10 Cohen v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Deposition2002-10-10 Cohen v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
IPSO 11161-22 Park’s of Hamilton Limited v The Scottish Sun, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of adjudication 11822-21 Law v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 02114-22 Bird v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 11120-22 Cozens-Hardy v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 11319-22 Maclennan… [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Conklin, Trey L. [read post]
