Search for: "Connecticut v. Massachusetts" Results 21 - 40 of 724
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2011, 9:11 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
  This year, that means we will soon get a ruling on Connecticut v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:20 pm by Scott R. Flick and Elizabeth Craig
Additional Obligations for Stations Whose License Renewal Applications Are Due by December 1, 2022 (Television Stations Licensed to Communities in Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont) December 1, 2022 is the date by which television stations in Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont must file their license renewal applications. [read post]
30 May 2007, 7:10 am
Strangely, not only has the world not come to a crashing halt after Massachusetts' gay may marriage venture, but the world has remained pretty much as it was after Connecticut's videotaped oral argument's adventure. [read post]
December 1 is the deadline for broadcast stations licensed to communities in Alabama, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Rhode Island, South Dakota, and Vermont to place their Annual EEO Public File Report in their Public Inspection File and post the report on their station website. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Anna Price
” Although the 1692 trials in Salem, Massachusetts are the most infamous witch trials in New England, witch trials began in Connecticut decades earlier. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 8:35 am
Today Iowa joined Connecticut and Massachusetts in recognizing same-sex marriage. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 5:00 pm
That makes Connecticut the third state, after Massachusetts and California, to legalize gay marriage. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:22 am
Google Inc., (2010-3652 Massachusetts Superior Court, Suffolk County (Boston)) and Skyhook Wireless v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 12:46 pm by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
OPM Would Deny Resolution for Connecticut, Vermont and New Hampshire Plaintiffs The Bi-Partisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) has filed a motion to stay the proceeding in Pedersen v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:57 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Indeed, this outcome was clearly compelled by applicable precedent given the Court’s prior holding, in Massachusetts v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 12:09 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
  They aren’t laughing now. 7)  I disagree with Ann re Sotomayor: she actually wasn’t on the panel that finally decided Connecticut v. [read post]