Search for: "Connolly v. Cir*" Results 101 - 120 of 214
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2022, 1:48 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit’s new eligibility decision in CareDx, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 3:35 pm by Lyle Denniston
Circuit in May 2010 (Al Maqaleh, et al., v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by Julie Hilden
On February 27 of this year, a three-judge Ninth Circuit panel issued its opinion in Dariano v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am by INFORRM
This was approved by Sullivan CJ in the Irish Supreme Court in Sinclair v Gogarty [1937] IR 377 (see also Gallagher v Tuohy (1924) 58 ILTR 134 (Murnaghan J); Connolly v Radio Telifís Eireann [1991] 2 IR 446 (Carroll J); Reynolds v Malocco [1999] 2 IR 203, [1999] 1 ILRM 289, [1998] IEHC 175 (11 December 1998) (Kelly J)); and it represents the law in Australia (Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O’Neill [2006] HCA 46 (28 September… [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
29 Oct 2006, 2:33 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, who left his associate position at the law firm of Williams and Connolly of Washington, D.C. law firm, to write full time about baseball. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 1:17 pm by Rosalind English
Although the public had a general right to be protected from material intended to cause them distress or anxiety, whether in the privacy of their own homes or in the workplace, (Connolly v DPP (2007) EWHC 237 (Admin), (2008) 1 WLR 276), both at common law and under the Human Rights Act 1998 and the Convention, freedom of speech or expression, and freedom of assembly and association, also constituted rights jealously safeguarded by English law (Redmond-Bate v DPP… [read post]