Search for: "Connolly v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2022, 9:33 pm
CONNOLLY, J.P. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 3:43 pm
In dismissing a complaint for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6), the Court of Chancery in Monroe County Employees’ Retirement Sys. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 4:29 pm
The husband appealed, and the Third Department in its July 10, 2014 opinion in Vega v. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 11:47 am
In January, however, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:41 am
’ See also United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:41 pm
On July 14, 2010, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, in the case of In Re: Pfizer Inc. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:45 pm
United States on Tuesday, which will impact the January 6 cases as well as others. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 1:53 am
Marvin Corley NASSAU COUNTYAttorneys' FeesLaw Firm Denied Summary Judgment on Account Stated; Defendant Raised Genuine Issues of Fact Goldberg & Connolly v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 11:02 am
Connolly, Jr., v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 10:04 am
M., & Connolly, D. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:17 pm
This latest stage of the litigation places the constitutional issue front and center.United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 3:53 pm
Maryland, 442 U.S. 735, 742-743 (1979) (telephone call logs conveyed to telephone company); United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 8:00 am
The 53-State Solution By Simon Barnicle, Writer and Attorney Simon Barnicle writes that adding new Democratic states could help bring the United States closer to majority-rule, and could increase pressure to add constitutional amendments to counteract current minority-rule constitutional provisions, like the Electoral College and the equal representation of senators. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 2:26 pm
On a motion by President Shrum, the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma dismissed the suit for lack of standing, ruling that the United States Supreme Court in Summers v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,SECTION 1. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:41 am
Kaster) (hsj, ) (Entered: 02/18/2009)United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:37 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 2:50 pm
Citing the United States Supreme Court, Vice Chancellor Laster stated “the power to award fees, including interim fees, is part of the original authority of the chancellor to do equity in a particular situation. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 10:00 pm
The obesity epidemic triggered a significant increase in the cost of health-care in the United States. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 2:31 pm
Then again, the SCOTUS could always review it to see if the opinion violates the Admission Act or the United States Constitution. [read post]
