Search for: "Connor v. Lesser"
Results 21 - 40
of 105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2020, 4:33 am
Turner v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:47 am
Freer v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 5:07 am
Santobello v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm
He cites “a justice who served as an Arizona state legislator” and quotes from Sandra Day O’Connor’s opinion in Davis v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
However, said the Appellate Division, even were imposing a lesser penalty possible, "it is not proper to substitute our judgment for that of [Respondent]" absent its finding that the penalty of termination was shocking or disproportionate under the circumstances, i.e., the penalty imposed violated so-called "Pell Doctrine," Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:42 am
Doe v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:40 am
Ohio v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 6:11 am
Lynch, 2003-Ohio-2284 (Involuntary manslaughter is a lesser-included offense for murder and aggravated murder State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 10:04 am
” This follows directly from New York v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm
Dogs were first used by the police in the early 1900s, and by the 1950s the modern era of police dog use was underway in the United States (Dorriety, Police Service Dogs in the Use-of-Force Continuum (2005) 16 Criminal Justice Policy Review 88). [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm
Dogs were first used by the police in the early 1900s, and by the 1950s the modern era of police dog use was underway in the United States (Dorriety, Police Service Dogs in the Use-of-Force Continuum (2005) 16 Criminal Justice Policy Review 88). [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm
Dogs were first used by the police in the early 1900s, and by the 1950s the modern era of police dog use was underway in the United States (Dorriety, Police Service Dogs in the Use-of-Force Continuum (2005) 16 Criminal Justice Policy Review 88). [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 8:42 am
In the 1919 case McKinley v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:58 am
Justices Anthony Kennedy and Sandra Day O’Connor, both seen as swing justices, also both voted predominantly with the conservatives, although to a lesser degree than some of their more conservative counterparts. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am
To make things more confusing, Justice Kennedy wrote the majority opinion reversing course, while Justice O’Connor (actually, Chief Justice O’Connor) wrote the dissent – just not the ones you think. [read post]
11 May 2018, 11:31 am
Pless v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 6:43 am
Pless v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 6:37 am
State v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am
The Hawaii v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm
Justice O’CONNOR delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 This case requires us to consider to what extent the “fair use” provision of the Copyright Revision Act of 1976, (hereinafter the Copyright Act) 17 U.S.C. [read post]
