Search for: "Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Respond"
Results 1 - 20
of 264
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2019, 2:50 am
Thus, Respondent must have known that a summary judgment motion not only was still possible at the time it consented to the extension, but also that, by agreeing to extend all deadlines, it was consenting as well to extend the time for filing a summary judgment motion. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 10:55 am
Thomas-Rasset, the RIAA has requested -- and received -- a 3 week extension of time in which to file its papers responding to defendant's motion to set aside the verdict. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 6:59 pm
In North Carolina Superior Court, there is no civil procedure tradition more respected than the courtesy of a thirty day extension of time to answer a Complaint or to respond to discovery. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 11:21 am
Here's the minute order:MINUTE ORDER granting Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Respond. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 3:06 pm
Consent. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:25 am
JFC sought Trans-High's consent for an extension of time for written discovery and for close of discovery, but opposer did not provide a definitive response. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 9:39 am
’ Then fill in the names of the parties involved, ensuring that the applicant is the same party who filed the original application or motion and the respondent is the same party who was the respondent in the original application or motion. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 12:43 pm
If the Defense counsel files a Motion to Suppress because the defendant did the smart thing by following this Blog's advice in not giving consent to search his home or car, will the Federal District Judge later retaliate at sentencing by giving the defendant a lengthier time in Federal prison? [read post]
4 May 2015, 4:12 pm
At that time, respondent's mother informed the Court that respondent had disobeyed the curfew she had set for him and that he had come home at whatever time he pleased, often in the early hours of the morning after having stayed out all night. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 9:41 pm
Applicable Law A party may revoke his consent to settle a case any time before judgment is rendered on the agreement. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 7:13 am
In light of the express terms of the [Agreement] regarding the timelines for the filing of a grievance and the requirement that extensions of such periods be by mutual consent, the arbitrator's interpretation is not reasonably debatable. [read post]
17 May 2014, 7:49 am
Respondent had extensive notes, and he probably did in fact issue a ruling from the bench. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 12:55 am
The federal lawsuits were filed in Delaware (also against Samsung and Nokia, the other respondents in the same ITC investigation). [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:39 pm
The TrustsStudent loan debt is the second largest category of consumer debt in the United States, just behind mortgages.3 More than 44 million consumers across the country collectively owe2 Consistent with the stipulated order extending the Bureau’s time to respond to the various intervention motions, see D.I. 46 at 2-3, this response only addresses the pending motions to intervene, and does not address movants’ objections to the Proposed… [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:39 pm
No. 17-cv-01323 (GMS)PLAINTIFF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU’SCONSOLIDATED RESPONSE TO MOTIONS TO INTERVENEPlaintiff Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“Bureau”) hereby responds to the motions to intervene filed by Ambac Assurance Corporation (“Ambac”) (D.I. 4); Transworld Systems Inc. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:36 am
Judge Pohl left the motion open for the government to respond and for further argument down the road. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:35 am
The district court denied the motion, ruling that the delay to allow the dog sniff was “de minimis” and did not implicate the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:22 am
The Chinese telecommunications hardware makers hope that the proceedings in federal court can dispose of an ongoing ITC investigation, which they would like to be stayed pending the federal lawsuit.In a pleading in support of its own motion for an extension of time to respond to those counterclaims (which was granted this week against Huawei and ZTE's opposition), InterDigital had already commented on the motion to expedite. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 9:45 am
Respondent's motion to reconsider was denied. [read post]
4 May 2007, 6:19 pm
On March 29, 2007 Judge Sullivan finally granted the Antitrust Division's motion to approve the consent decrees between the United States and SBC and AT&T, and between the United States and MCI and Verizon. [read post]
