Search for: "Conservatorship of Whitley" Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2010, 7:57 am by Steven G. Pearl
In Conservatorship of Whitley (November 8, 2010) --- Cal.4th ---, the California Supreme Court has held that litigants who have personal, non-pecuniary motives to pursue litigation may recover private attorney general attorney fees under Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 4:42 pm by Arthur F. Coon
San Francisco Bd. of Permit Appeals (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 961 – that was disapproved by the recent Supreme Court decision in Conservatorship of Whitley (2010) 50 Cal.4th 1206. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:51 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Hansen In Conservatorship of Whitley (2010) 50 Cal. 4th 1206, the California Supreme Court examined the three requirements that litigants must prove in order to recover attorneys’ fees under California’s ‘private attorney general’ fee statute in Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 4:47 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Subsequent to the trial court decision, the California Supreme Court decided Conservatorship of Whitley (2010) 50 Cal. 4th 1206 which held that the proper focus was on the pecuniary interests. [read post]