Search for: "Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Estate of Moore"
Results 1 - 1
of 1
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2017, 6:38 am
Consolidated Rail Corp., 14 Ohio Misc. 2d 4 (Van Wert C.P. 1983) (“[T]o creat a fee simple determinable . . . there must be the limiting words, such as “so long as,” and if these words are contained in the habendum clause rather than in the granting clause, then there must also be a provision for forfeiture or reversion. [read post]
