Search for: "Consolidation Coal Company v." Results 21 - 40 of 62
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Circuit held that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) lawfully revoked Mingo Logan Coal Company’s permit, issued by the U.S. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 7:13 am by Daniel Jin
The secretary of state can direct airport operators to detain Russian aircraft in U.K. airspace and the CAA may refuse, suspend or revoke permissions for Russian aircraft; and[v] Luxury goods: Other measures include a ban on the export of high-end luxury goods to Russia and higher import tariffs on key Russian goods. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 3:05 pm by Ronald Mann
Kagan, writing for all the justices except Justice Neil Gorsuch, treats the case as a straightforward application of a framework established in the court’s 1994 decision in Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 8:01 am by John Jascob
Republicans offered amendments to all three bills that would have provided that a public company need not make a disclosure unless the thing to be disclosed met the materiality standard expressed by the Supreme Court in TSC Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 4:37 am
KV Pharmaceutical Company, et al. (07/23/2007): multiple suits filed by plaintiffs in various jurisdictions asserting the defendants' filed ANDAs infringe their patents; cases consolidated in Missouri; appeal of grant of summary judgment finding the patents invalid and unenforceable (affirmed-in-part, vacated-in-part, and remanded); discussion of two patents related to a composition used to treat angina, hypertension, and congestive heart failure (U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 7:09 am
Massey Coal, et al. (08-22). [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 3:55 pm by Lovechilde
Dirty U.S. coal companies threaten the health of residents in frontline communities and fuel global climate disruption. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 8:40 am
Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: RME Petroleum Company v. [read post]