Search for: "Constitution Party of South Dakota"
Results 21 - 40
of 377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2018, 10:28 am
South Dakota’s law thus appears to “work” presuming that the imposition of sales tax on out-of-state sales is now constitutional. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:58 am
Legislatures Coming Into Session Utah 1/23/12 Minnesota 1/24/12 Committee Activity of Note January 23 South Dakota House Judiciary Committee HB 1064 Allows the Supreme Court to establish certain rules for the use of interactive audio visual equipment and to provide for the collection and deposit of fees for the use thereof. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 1:03 pm
With the Democratic party in control of the House and Senate, discussions have been picking up over whether the District of Columbia will be granted statehood. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 2:00 pm
On March 5, 2018, the Tax Foundation has submitted an amicus brief, in support of neither party, urging that last approach.[16] Our brief argues that the South Dakota law is constitutional, but Quill need not be overturned. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 3:05 pm
In South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
The South Dakota Supreme Court affirmed. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:33 am
Yesterday (March 12) South Dakota’s governor signed into law HB 1253 which reads “No court, administrative agency, or other governmental agency may enforce any provisions of any religious code. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 11:13 am
Our neighbors to the north and south provide us with an immediate frame of reference. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:01 am
The problem isn’t the way South Dakota maneuvered. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
South Dakota’s heavily modified version (“No court, arbitrator, administrative agency, or other adjudicative mediation or enforcement authority may render any judgment predicated on any religious code or enforce any provisions of any religious code. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 8:59 am
Legislatures Coming Into Session NONE Legislatures Going Out of Session South Dakota 3/19 Floor/Committee Activity of Note March 19 Missouri Senate Floor SB 676 Mandates that any court, arbitration, tribunal, or administrative agency ruling shall be unenforceable if based on a foreign law that does not grant the parties the same rights as the parties have under the United States and Missouri constitutions. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 1:47 am
The issue actually arose in a South Dakota case that was decided by the S.D. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 8:49 pm
Eastern Farmers Cooperative (EFC) applied for a conditional use permit to allow EFC to build and operate an agronomy facility on approximately 60 acres of land located a few miles north of Colton, South Dakota. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 8:49 pm
Eastern Farmers Cooperative (EFC) applied for a conditional use permit to allow EFC to build and operate an agronomy facility on approximately 60 acres of land located a few miles north of Colton, South Dakota. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
On a range of issues, the Republican Party has embraced a kind of messianic politics. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 4:39 pm
" South Dakota Governor Signs Outrageous Law Restricting Abortion Care This is a bill that requires women to jump through flaming hoops for abortion care; women must get counseling — which is, by law, invasive, anti-choice and medically frightening — and then wait 72 anxious and potentially dangerous hours before being allowed access to their constitutional right to an abortion. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 9:00 pm
I began as a Maricopa County Public Defender after passing both the Arizona and South Dakota Bar Exams. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 9:00 pm
I began as a Maricopa County Public Defender after passing both the Arizona and South Dakota Bar Exams. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 6:56 am
Myers appealed to the South Dakota Supreme Court, which rejected his argument: Since the parties stipulated that Myers did not commit any acts of abuse, torture, torments, or cruel punishment as listed within SDCL 26-10-1, the only word that we must construe is “expose. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 4:55 pm
Aug. 28, 2008), recently affirmed by the South Dakota Supreme Court: [Father] is a little more able to [provide for the 6-year-old son's "temporal, mental and moral welfare"] than [mother]…. [read post]
