Search for: "Constitution Party of South Dakota" Results 81 - 100 of 380
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
Florida: South Miami’s Mayor Shut Down an Opponent at Meetings. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 6:42 am by Jim Sedor
South Dakota – South Dakota Legislators Seek Hasty Repeal of Ethics Law Voters PassedNew York Times – Monica Davey [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:04 pm by Katherine Pompilio
Constitution and “return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 2:09 pm by Robert Black
Another state, South Dakota, stated that its ratification would lapse after the original 1979 deadline. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Other states have applied this rule to primaries: Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, and Vermont. [read post]
The outcome of this case could have a significant impact on his strategy going forward. [1] The states are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [2] Texas, et al. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 10:10 am by Bill Raftery
South Dakota’s House is also considering adding the following to their constitution (HJR 1004) No such court [i.e. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:48 pm by Will Baude
One of this morning's more consequential Supreme Court decisions was South Dakota v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
§ 2254 (Dkt. 1); the response filed in opposition thereto (Dkt. 7); Petitioner’s Reply (Dkt. 11); the parties’ Supplemental Memoranda (Dkts. 25, 31, 36); and the Amicus Brief filed in support of Petitioner. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At Stanford Law Review Online, Brian Galle discusses South Dakota v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  Those states were Oklahoma in its code and in the case of In the Matter of Baby Boy L.[28] and South Dakota in the case of Matter of Adoption of Baade[29]. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:32 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  They are supporting a political movement and a major American party that show no evidence of stopping until they destroy American constitutional democracy. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:32 am by Steve Vladeck
Suffice it to say, the issue is whether the expansion of Medicaid eligibility in the ACA, which the parties agree would be severable from the rest of the bill if the minimum essential coverage provision were invalidated, itself violates the Tenth Amendment by "coercing" the states--along the lines Chief Justice Rehnquist hinted at in his majority opinion in South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:58 am by Kevin Kaufman
Georgia, Hawaii, and South Carolina legislatively decoupled from the inclusion of GILTI in the tax base. [read post]