Search for: "Constitution Party of South Dakota" Results 101 - 120 of 380
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2022, 12:18 pm by Kate Fort
Abourezk/Lakota People’s Law Project : Passage of ICWA and issues in South Dakota [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” Meanwhile, the Court passed over civil non-retroactivity doctrine in South Dakota v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 10:48 am by msatta
Young voters are also a target as states including Arizona, North Dakota, Ohio, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas enact strict voter ID laws and refuse to allow university students to use their student IDs to vote. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 8:22 am by Bill Raftery
However, in mid-June Michigan introduced a bill (HB 4769) co-sponsored by 42 of 63 Michigan House Republicans that copied much of the language from the versions introduced in Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Missouri, South Dakota, and West Virginia, in particular the use of the term “informal tribunals” or “informal administrative body” in all of these versions, something that does not appear in the others. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 12:01 pm by Alan S. Kaplinsky
  The relevant states are Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, and South Dakota (“Subject States”). [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am by JB
The Act passed along party lines in March 2010. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 11:35 am by Sara J. Higgins
The attorney general of Arizona has already filed a lawsuit in an effort to prevent the vaccine mandate from taking effect, and attorney generals and governors from New Hampshire and South Dakota have promised similar legal action. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Chris Christie ended his presidential campaign after his criticism of Donald Trump’s leadership and role in the Republican Party proved to diverge too far from where the GOP currently stands. [read post]
29 May 2012, 8:24 am by Bill Raftery
Prohibits a court from granting certain motions if the transfer is likely to affect the constitutional rights of the nonmoving party. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:43 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
”  The Senators also point out that under Becker’s leadership, the Board has threatened four states (Arizona, South Carolina, South Dakota and Utah) with lawsuits over constitutional provisions protecting secret ballot union elections that were adopted by the voters of those states, but has ignored provisions in other states that conflict with federal law but benefit unions over employers. [read post]
14 May 2012, 6:52 am by Bill Raftery
Prohibits a court from granting certain motions if the transfer is likely to affect the constitutional rights of the nonmoving party. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:40 am by Bill Raftery
Prohibits a court from granting certain motions if the transfer is likely to affect the constitutional rights of the nonmoving party. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 11:18 am by Bill Raftery
Prohibits a court from granting certain motions if the transfer is likely to affect the constitutional rights of the nonmoving party. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:30 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court’s ruling in South Dakota v. [read post]