Search for: "Construction Service Company v. the United States" Results 1 - 20 of 1,340
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2014, 3:39 pm
Employees of private contractors and subcontractors who provide services to publicly traded companies including mutual funds are protected by the whistleblower provisions of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Act"), the United States Supreme Court held in its decision dated March 4, 2014. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 1:16 pm by Derek P. Hartman
In a 5-4 decision, the United States Supreme Court held state agencies are not immune from claims brought under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) in the case Torres v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-421 Filed: December 27, 2018 ALICE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 7:30 pm
(The other two cases are United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 2:07 pm by Brooke Wahlberg
Fish and Wildlife Service (“Service”) authorizing a construction company to disturb a pair of nesting bald eagles. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 7:52 am by Eric Goldman
YouTube, an online service “censors” its users only if it is a state actor. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 11:37 am by Andrew Lustigman
The recent Supreme Court term resulted in a number of very important decisions that will impact companies engaging in advertising and marketing in the United States. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 12:48 pm by Melody Lanier
Trucking Accidents in the United States: A State-by-State AnalysisTrucking plays a vital role in the U.S. economy, ensuring everyday goods are transported across the nation efficiently. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 12:48 pm by Melody Lanier
Trucking Accidents in the United States: A State-by-State AnalysisTrucking plays a vital role in the U.S. economy, ensuring everyday goods are transported across the nation efficiently. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 10:43 am by Gail Cecchettini Whaley
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court held that service advisors at car dealerships are exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) overtime pay requirement under an exemption for any “salesman, partsman, or mechanic primarily engaged in selling or servicing automobiles …” (Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 2:05 pm by Jordan Bierkos
In Razar Contracting Services Ltd. v Evoqua Water (“Razar Contracting”),[1] Razar Contracting Services Ltd. v Evoqua Water, 2021 MBQB 69. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:58 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
In favor of the current de novo approach are all of the operating companies: the medical technology company Fresenius Kabi and two coalitions of high-tech and service companies: Intel, EMC, Facebook, Red Hat, and Verizon, and Google, Dell, HP, Salesforce.com, Twitter, Yahoo! [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 12:23 pm by Steven Koprince
United States, No. 12-882C (2013), the Court held that a veteran could control his Rhode Island-based construction company by electronic means, even though the veteran spent half of the year residing in Florida. [read post]