Search for: "Consumers Life Ins. Co. v. Smith" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am by MOTP
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Hartford Life Ins Co    Eastern District of Kentucky at LexingtonRONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993); General Electric Co. v. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am by MOTP
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
I am happy to report the publication of my article,  "The Corporate Social Responsibilities of Financial Institutions for the Conduct of their Borrowers: The View From International Law and Standards," Lewis & CLark Law Review 21(4):881-920 (2018). [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:22 am by Steve Bainbridge
Welfare economics classically recognizes four basic sources of market failures: producer monopoly; the good to be produced is a public good; informational asymmetry between producer and consumer; and externalities. [read post]