Search for: "Continental Assur. Co. v. Davis" Results 1 - 3 of 3
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2009, 5:55 am
Conflicts between counsel for the parties developed immediately thereafter when plaintiff, prior to the EUO, refused to release a jet washer, one of the items allegedly damaged in the fire, without receiving adequate assurances that the item would be protected. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
The Board also adopted the judges' finding that a Gissel bargaining order was necessary and warranted under NLRB v. [read post]