Search for: "Continental Resources v. Fair"
Results 1 - 20
of 41
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2019, 7:02 am
V. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 8:16 am
FTC v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 8:44 am
The plaintiffs in Parker Drilling Management Services, Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 9:54 am
Continental Airlines, Inc., 6:10cv120 (E.D. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 8:12 am
Summary of Decision issued March 23, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Ultra Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm
Optis v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:50 pm
The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising [here and here are earlier katposts] might look not so attractive for the IP professions, but they are wrong, as the Nagoya-to-go-person Darren explains in this step-by-step Q&A that Jeremy enthusiastically re-launches.* The IPKat and his friends: a round-up of some IP weblog news Every three months or thereabouts, the IPKat and… [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 6:02 am
Additional Resources: Jimenz v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Dastar Corp. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
Fair trad [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 2:24 pm
Fair v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 2:40 pm
Continental Resources, Tyler v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 12:09 am
Whilst the territorial sea envisages complete sovereign rights, the continental shelf is a halfway house for sovereign rights and the EEZ allows for limited exploitation of economic resources, scientific research, marine environment and artificial structures. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 1:33 am
Take IP Bridge v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:31 pm
Thus, Hu Jingtao stateds that “We have strived to ensure and improve the people's wellbeing, promoted social fairness and justice, worked to build a harmonious world, and strengthened the Party's governance capacity and advanced nature. [read post]
3 May 2007, 3:13 pm
On this point, see Continental Airlines, Inc. v. continentalairlines.com. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 4:37 am
Cunningham v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
(Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 10:44 am
ITT Continental Baking Co., 420 U.S. 223, 236 n.10 (1975)) and "that it was 'customary' that 'the consent decree did not purport to adjudicate' the plaintiff’s claims" (Maher v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
