Search for: "Contreras v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 94
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2019, 7:09 am by Florian Mueller
Every such filing serves a purpose, even the one that George Soros funded--as the latter makes, apart from some far-fetched theories and overregulatory ideology, a number of surprisingly reasonable points (like a limited dose of a poisonous substance potentially serving a medical purpose) and may appeal to any ultraliberal(s) on the panel (a political inclination the Ninth Circuit has a reputation for, though President Trump--the most profilic nominator of federal judges in history--has already… [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 8:55 am by Florian Mueller
As the great Rush Limbaugh said a few years ago:"George Soros' objective is to agitate and vibrate the United States into a crumbling state of disrepair. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 8:12 am by Ruthann Robson
Trump, United States District Judge for the District of Columbia, Rudolph Contreras, issued a preliminary injunction requiring the defendants President Trump... [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:26 am by Steve Lubet
President Nixon was forced to turn over the Watergate tapes to the special prosecutor (U.S. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am by Lisa Ouellette
Jonathan Masur – "The outcome in Oil States provides a possibly counter-intuitive answer as to whether panel stacking by the PTO director will remain permissible. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:50 am by Jason Rantanen
Dispute Over Method 207 The United States Pharmacopeial Convention (USP) is an SDO that develops standards for testing the quality and purity of foods and drugs. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:08 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Soto v Contreras, 2018 WL 507802 (5th Cir., 2018) Veronica Lemus Contreras (Lemus), a native and citizen of Mexico residing in the United States, appealed from a judgment which granted the petition of Ontiveros Soto’s (Ontiveros) seeking return of their child, A.O.L., to Mexico. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 12:40 pm by Kym Stapleton
Defendants' sentences do not violate the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution.[.] [read post]