Search for: "Cook v. Civil Service Commission" Results 61 - 80 of 119
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2015, 3:49 am by INFORRM
The Panopticon blog examines the European Commission’s response to Schrems. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 12:45 pm by Ruth Levush
Supreme Court Justice Harlan’s concurring opinion in Katz v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and involves the right to challenge the conciliation proceedings of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in employment discrimination matters. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
‘Exposing a Grave Injustice’: Montreal Exclusivity and the Rights of Disabled Passengers On March 5, 2014 the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in Stott v Thomas Cook (previewed for the UK Supreme Court blog last autumn here). [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
And while that is certainly true, there is danger in over-relying on the analogies so often drawn between software and other, more-conventional products and services. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Civil Procedure/Police: Issue EstoppelPenner v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 8:22 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Cook County Commission on Human Rights, Case No. 114876 - May the Cook County Commission on Human Rights award punitive damages? [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 11:27 pm
He chaired a Task Force on Access to Justice of the Ministère de la justice du Québec (1989-91), and has been a consultant to the Bouchard-Taylor Commission (2007-2008), the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (1991-1992), to the Ontario Civil Justice Review and to the Federal Department of Justice on the interaction of federal law and the Civil Code of Québec. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm by John Elwood
  The Court is most likely holding Cook v. [read post]