Search for: "Cook v. Cook" Results 441 - 460 of 6,252
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2012, 10:26 am
Here's proof positive that it's not only first-year law students who get confused by fairly straightforward principles of federal question jurisdiction. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 11:00 am
In a Cook County medical malpractice lawsuit, the Illinois Appellate Court recently ruled that a hospital could not be held liable for the potential negligence of one of its independent contractors in Lamb-Rosenfeldt v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 5:05 am
The sign that appears above is registered as a trade mark for Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs, milk and milk products; edible oils and fats; prepared meals; soups and potato crisps; canned foodstuffs; pizza toppings; preparations for making pizza toppings; dried preparations for use [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 6:38 am by Joy Waltemath
Neither a franchise agreement nor the economic realities test supported a finding that an owner/franchisor, by merely providing advice to a struggling franchisee, acted as the employer of its cook, the Fifth Circuit ruled, overturning a jury verdict and finding the owner/franchisor was entitled to judgment as a matter of law (Orozco v Plackis, July 3, 2014, Stewart, C). [read post]
16 Jun 2006, 6:12 am
This week's New Jersey Legal Update podcast will discuss the recent Appellate Court decision in Siddons v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 5:40 pm
Court of Appeals recently announced its decision in the Cook v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:40 am
Court of Appeals recently announced its decision in the Cook v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 3:19 pm
Cook Inlet Region, Inc., which deals with age discrimination and shareholder distributions, and Michigan Gambling Opposition v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:40 am
Court of Appeals recently announced its decision in the Cook v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:40 am
Court of Appeals recently announced its decision in the Cook v. [read post]