Search for: "Cook v. Downs et al" Results 61 - 80 of 119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2019, 3:20 pm by Robert Kreisman
Capital Fitness, Inc. d/b/a XSport Fitness, et al., No. 2-17-1035 (Appellate Court of Illinois, Second Judicial District). [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 8:32 am
  The  judge’s 48-page opinion in Gherebi, et al., v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:33 am by Patti Waller
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[42] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:33 am by Bill Marler
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[33] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no real margin of error, and the cost of error can be death. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:55 am by Bill Marler
 It is for this precise reason that the USDA has repeatedly rejected calls from the meat industry to hold consumers primarily responsible for E. coli O157:H7 infections caused, in part, by mistakes in food-handling or cooking.[34] E. coli O157:H7 infection may lead to severe complications, both acute and chronic. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:37 am by Bill Marler
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[42] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:07 pm by Bill Marler
 It is for this precise reason that the USDA has repeatedly rejected calls from the meat industry to hold consumers primarily responsible for E. coli O157:H7 infections caused, in part, by mistakes in food-handling or cooking.[34] E. coli O157:H7 infection may lead to severe complications, both acute and chronic. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
IPSO IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 09380-19 Clattenburg v dailystar.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), Resolved- IPSO mediation 08479-19 Forbes v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach- after investigation 08417-19 Cooney et al. v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication 08376-19 Malone v The Scotsman, 1 Accuracy (2019), 2 Privacy… [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:00 am by John Day
 Since lost profits can rarely be computed down to the last penny, [1Recovery of Damages for Lost Profits§ 5.1, at 382], the evidence needed to support an award for lost profits need only provide a reasonable or rational basis for calculating what the lost profits would have been. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Butler are both associated with the law firm of Spiros Law, P.C. in Kankakee, Ill.Peyton Heathcoat, et al. v. [read post]