Search for: "Cook v. Texas Department of Health and Human Services" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2015, 8:46 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Final Rule also quantifies the minimum amount of potable water the employer must provide (4.5 gallons per day for drinking and cooking purposes). [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 3:51 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Keck, et al., No. 3:12-cv-02088 (D.S.C.), filed on July 25, 2012 by KV against the South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services challenging the latter’s prior authorization policy favoring compounded HPC formulations over Makena® (ongoing); (3) K-V Pharmaceutical Co., et al. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 5:30 am by Bill Marler
This business had been supplied with meat produced by North Country Cooked Meats which subsequently produced a positive test result for the outbreak strain of listeria. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
In 2019, based on Rust, the Department of Health and Human Services instituted new referral and separation provisions. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am by Steven M. Taber
An EPA pesticides and toxics program manager in Seattle said disposing of PCB waste improperly can be harmful to human health and the environment. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm by Steven M. Taber
Environmental Protection Agency, state Department of Health and three environmental groups. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
No problem…: Lundbeck A/S v Generics UK Ltd & Ors: (IPKat), Exelon (Rivastigmine Tartrate) – Dr Reddy’s and Novartis settle Exelon patent dispute: (Therapeutics Daily), GeneMaker – Codon Devices, Blue Heron Biotechnology settle patent suit over gene synthesis platform: (Patent Docs), Glucophage (Metformin) – Depomed settles patent litigation against IVAX: (SmartBrief), (IP Law360), (GenericsWeb), Lexapro… [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson concluded that a 2013 letter he sent to the Justice Department’s Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) office was not part of any formal FARA filing, so could not be the basis for a charge under a law barring false FARA submissions. [read post]