Search for: "Cooke v. Cooke" Results 161 - 180 of 6,258
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2023, 5:58 pm by Bill Marler
In addition, FoodNet conducts active laboratory- and population-based surveillance. [7] In 2006, public health officials from 48 states reported 1,270 foodborne disease outbreaks, with a confirmed or suspect source in 884 of the outbreaks (70%). [8] Only one of the outbreaks with a confirmed source was attributed to Listeria, with this outbreak involving eleven hospitalizations and one death. [8] The next year, of 17,883 lab-confirmed infections, the CDC attributed 122 to Listeria. [9] In 2009,… [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 3:29 am by SHG
Supreme Court’s 2020 ruling in Bostock v Clayton County, which held that Title VII’s ban on sex discrimination also extended to transgender and gay workers. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:00 pm by Joel R. Brandes
She testified that they interacted in person for a total of five or six times, including a February 2021 visit to her home, when he cooked a meal and played chess. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:28 pm by Giles Peaker
His disabilities necessitate support with everyday activities, including cooking, personal care, dressing and mobilising. [read post]
7 May 2023, 11:43 am by Bill Marler
My law practice lives and breathes the science of foodborne illness epidemiology. [read post]
4 May 2023, 11:28 am by Jim Walker
In the last twenty (20) years, only three cruise ships have obtained lower sanitation scores than the MSC Seaside (the un-Cruise Aventure’s Safari Endeavour (68), Bernhard Schulte Cruise Services’ Amadea (63). and V. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:05 pm by News Desk
Finding 10-year-old kids working in a kitchen late at night near dangerous cooking equipment is a cause for child labor concern and action by the U.S. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:15 pm by Eileen McDermott
The CAFC said the inventor’s contribution did not satisfy the three-part test articulated in Pannu v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:15 pm by Eileen McDermott
The CAFC said the inventor’s contribution did not satisfy the three-part test articulated in Pannu v. [read post]