Search for: "Cooke v. Superior Court (Cooke) (1978)"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2021, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 7:49 pm
More recently, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice released a decision in Barker v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm
(Chris Cooke, “Textualism is Not Strict Constructionism is Not Originalism,“leastdangerousblog.com, July 8, 2018). [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
Tim Cook’s Response to the Judge’s Order. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
Cook, 159 Wash.2d 837, 154 P.3d 206 (Washington Supreme Court 2007 (quoting Tenore v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
Further discussion of the desirability (or otherwise) of abolishing appeals to the Privy Council arose: in 1978 in the Report of the Royal Commission on the Courts; in 1989 in a Law Commission Paper on the Structure of the Courts; in 1995 in a report by the Solicitor General to the Cabinet Strategy Committee on court structures; in a Discussion Paper called “Reshaping New Zealand’s Appeal Structure” issued in 2000 by the Attorney General; and in… [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 11:51 am
District Judge Marcia Cooke, Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 10:26 am
” Cook v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Superior Court (Monex), 176 Cal.App.4th 1554 (2009);andnbsp;andnbsp; ATandamp;T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 4:00 am
In Elcich v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
Manriquez petitioned the superior court for a writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
City of New York (1978); (2) whether the severity of a regulation’s economic impact on a going business concern should be measured by diminution in value or diminution in return; and (3) whether the purpose of a government regulation is still a relevant consideration under the “character” prong of Penn Central, in light of this Court’s repudiation of the “substantially advances a legitimate state interest” test. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
CornelioIn a January 7, 2009 decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Cornelio v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 10:45 am
Arrington, 5 M.J. 756, 758-59 (A.C.M.R. 1978) (Cook, J., concurring).While I've never particularly cared for the phrase "our superior court" -- especially when used by appellate government counsel -- there's something oddly charming about the phrase "our Supreme Court. [read post]
16 May 2008, 10:59 am
Superior Court (1996) 14 Cal.4th 294, 313-314, 58 Cal.Rptr.2d 855, 926 P.2d 1042 [discussing Hale].) [read post]
13 May 2007, 5:52 am
Hughes and Stephen Hughes v. [read post]