Search for: "Cooke v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,466
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2022, 8:40 am
" (United States v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 5:50 pm
Cook v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Matter of Cook v Nassau County Police Dept., 140 AD3d 1059, the Appellate Division noted that the State Legislature, "[in] order to create a clear deterrent to unreasonable delays and denials of access [and thereby] encourage every unit of government to make a good faith effort to comply with the requirements of FOIL", provided for the assessment of an attorney's fee and other litigation costs in FOIL proceedings. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Matter of Cook v Nassau County Police Dept., 140 AD3d 1059, the Appellate Division noted that the State Legislature, "[in] order to create a clear deterrent to unreasonable delays and denials of access [and thereby] encourage every unit of government to make a good faith effort to comply with the requirements of FOIL", provided for the assessment of an attorney's fee and other litigation costs in FOIL proceedings. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Matter of Cook v Nassau County Police Dept., 140 AD3d 1059, the Appellate Division noted that the State Legislature, "[in] order to create a clear deterrent to unreasonable delays and denials of access [and thereby] encourage every unit of government to make a good faith effort to comply with the requirements of FOIL", provided for the assessment of an attorney's fee and other litigation costs in FOIL proceedings. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Matter of Cook v Nassau County Police Dept., 140 AD3d 1059, the Appellate Division noted that the State Legislature, "[in] order to create a clear deterrent to unreasonable delays and denials of access [and thereby] encourage every unit of government to make a good faith effort to comply with the requirements of FOIL", provided for the assessment of an attorney's fee and other litigation costs in FOIL proceedings. [read post]
1 May 2022, 6:15 am
In that context, the baseline problem is strongly associated with Cass Sunstein, and especially with his analysis of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Lochner v. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm
Treatment could be cooking, high hydrostatic pressure, irradiation, or other validated processes. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 4:08 pm
Well, first, don’t eat British Columbia, Canada oysters for a bit. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 6:46 am
As of the writing of this article in April of 2022, inflation stands at 7.87% percent per year in the United States. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 12:51 am
While Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ("YGR") of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California had some great moments during the Epic Games v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm
On 14 March 2022, the Supreme Court denied Julian Assange permission to appeal against the High Court’s decision to extradite him to the United State as the application did not raise an arguable point of law. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 6:13 am
The United States Constitution’s supremacy clause requires that federal law be followed first when there is a conflict with state law. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:53 pm
In a seminal 1977 discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 8:00 am
She had been studying to become a teacher in the United States Virgin Islands and was survived by her husband and 12-year-old daughter. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 7:56 am
See United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 5:52 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 3:56 pm
In Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 2:29 pm
In short, the strongest justification for issuing new merger guidelines is based on false premises: an alleged decline in competition within the Unites States. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 8:00 am
United States, No. 18 C 2230 (In the Northern District of Illinois). [read post]
