Search for: "Cool v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 676
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2007, 2:58 am
Cool opening. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:48 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:17 pm
Obscure Patents: KSR Does Not Mean MuchSo much has been made about the United States Supreme Court's decision in KSR v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 5:52 pm
. - The relevant "island" at issue -- Kingman Reef Atoll -- actually sounds pretty cool. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 8:47 am
In total, Davidoff’s inspectors examined 33,369 units of COOL WATER fragrances. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 6:40 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 5:09 pm
CRS – Statement of Charles V. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 5:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 6:59 pm
See Appellate Body Report, United States—Certain Country of Origin Labelling (COOL) Requirements, ¶ 343, WT/DS384/AB/R (Jun. 29, 2012). (...) [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 12:31 am
United States, a Federal Circuit decision affirming the Court of International Trade is a good example.The issue here was whether protests were timely filed. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 10:40 am
The bulk of commentary from legal academics on President Trump's Executive Order concerning admission of non-citizens into the United States has involved creative advocacy rather than useful analysis. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 6:23 pm
The United States has done so much for Germany in the 20th century. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
United States. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 10:10 pm
(Orin Kerr) I was just reading a fascinating old Fourth Amendment decision, United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 5:04 pm
The report is available at this link, and here is how it is described: In response to a suggestion in a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:13 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 11:28 am
It ultimately issued a rule that imposed stringent standards on the facilities that – literally – use 99.8% of all water withdrawn for industrial purposes in the United States, while giving those facilities substantial flexibility in how to meet the standards. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 7:13 am
by Dennis Crouch Gabara v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:42 pm
Waste treatment systems, including treatment ponds or lagoons designed to meet the requirements of CWA (other than cooling ponds as defined in 40 CFR 423.11(m) which also meet the criteria of this definition) are not waters of the United States. [read post]
