Search for: "Cool v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 676
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2015, 5:57 am
I thought Jerad was cool, but fuck him, he was a CI. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 3:00 pm by Larry
United States, answers the question, "Are those cool looking video walls that show up in office building lobbies, hotel lobbies, and fancy conference centers monitors of the sort that are used with computers? [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:35 pm
  Castrillon agreed to organize the smuggling of 100 kilos of marijuana, worth $70,000 to $100,000, from Tijuana to the United States. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:40 am by Keith Lee
United States – Whether the constitutional freedom of the press, guaranteed by the First Amendment, was subordinate to a claimed need of the executive branch of government to maintain the secrecy of information. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 11:33 am by David Lat
It was the subject of a recent Supreme Court case, Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:18 am by Peter Margulies
This subsection’s language permits return to “contiguous” countries that share a border with the United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 1:01 pm by Lawrence Solum
United States) harkened back to Chief Justice Marshall's approach in Marbury v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 7:33 pm
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, the United States Tax Court stated that "if a settlement agreement lacks express language stating what the amount paid pursuant to that agreement was to settle, the intent of the payor is critical to that determination. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:34 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
  Plaintiff did not obtain a registration for these videos before filing suit, because “Plaintiff is a foreign citizen and did not register all of his videos and photos in the United States. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 1:31 pm
Baer, 973 P.2d 1225, 1231 (Colo. 1999).In the Interest of R.D., supra.The court then took up the First Amendment issue, explaining that theFirst Amendment of the United States Constitution provides that “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm by Marie Louise
– Estate of Chet Baker v Sony (Excess Copyright) When a ‘Substantial Payment’ is not enough: Gutter Filter Company L.L.C. v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 12:10 pm by Rick Garnett
There have been a presidential election, a change in control of the United States Senate, two bizarre and seemingly endless party primaries, and the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]