Search for: "Coombs v. Coombs" Results 1 - 20 of 74
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2010, 2:03 am by traceydennis
Regina (Coombes) v Waltham Forest London Borough Council Queen’s Bench Division “Section 3 of the Protection from Eviction Act 1977 was not incompatible with article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 2:57 am by traceydennis
Regina (Coombes) v Waltham Forest London Borough Council and another [2010] WLR (D) 70 “S 3 of the Eviction Act 1977 was not incompatible with arts 6 and 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:17 am by Dave
  Third, amidst the usual welter of authorities being discussed, it was particularly interesting to see the Irish cases (Donegan v Dublin CC [2008] IEHC 288; Dublin CC v Gallagher [2008] IEHC 354) being drawn on in this context, although they are a bit of a sideshow. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:37 am by Dave
We have been aware of Coombes v LB Waltham Forest (Sec of State intervening) noted at [2010] All ER (D) 59 and on Lawtel, decided on 08.03.2010 in an extempore judgment (Cranston J), but waiting for the full transcript to be provided by the High Court. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:37 am by Dave
We have been aware of Coombes v LB Waltham Forest (Sec of State intervening) noted at [2010] All ER (D) 59 and on Lawtel, decided on 08.03.2010 in an extempore judgment (Cranston J), but waiting for the full transcript to be provided by the High Court. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 4:44 am
In an opinion with potentially broad implications, the Supreme Judicial Court here in Massachusetts has ruled (click on Coombes v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 6:45 pm by pittlegalscholarship
Miami Mary Coombs (Miami Law) presents “The Rhetoric of Rationing. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 10:50 pm
Hence the premise of “SWAT,” a new comedy written and directed by Sam Coombes. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 6:38 am
Coombe asserted a defense of qualified immunity with respect to the constitutional claims, where "government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory of constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known", quoting Harlow v. [read post]