Search for: "Coombs v. Coombs"
Results 41 - 60
of 74
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
First credit goes to HHJ Purle QC, sitting as a judge of the High Court, who has managed the seemingly impossible task of giving judgment in such a case without reference to any authority (beyond Yeoman's Row v Cobbe, but on the quantum meruit point), despite the case being redolent (at least) of the facts in Lloyds Bank v Rosset, Midland Bank v Cooke, Coombes v Smith, Cobbe (on the estoppel point), Stack v Dowden, Thorner v Major… [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
First credit goes to HHJ Purle QC, sitting as a judge of the High Court, who has managed the seemingly impossible task of giving judgment in such a case without reference to any authority (beyond Yeoman's Row v Cobbe, but on the quantum meruit point), despite the case being redolent (at least) of the facts in Lloyds Bank v Rosset, Midland Bank v Cooke, Coombes v Smith, Cobbe (on the estoppel point), Stack v Dowden, Thorner v Major… [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 7:11 am
Coombes and Edited by Zsolt Debrczy. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:00 pm
See EEOC v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 10:55 pm
Oral argument will take place on January 7, 2008, in Baze v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 8:33 am
As Judge Calabresi sees it, Chatin v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 5:00 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 12:20 pm
In United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 2:05 am
Obiter J points out: R v Smurthwaite and Gill 1994 involved “Solicitation to Murder. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm
Mrs Justice Rafferty noted the Croatian cases, and the observation of Cranston J in Coombes v Waltham Forest LBC [2010] EWHC 666 Admin that There is an obvious conflict between the Strasbourg jurisprudence and our own However, following Husband v Solihull MBC [2009] EWHC 3673 (Admin) and Wandsworth LBC v Dixon [2009] EWHC 27 [links to our reports], Qazi was held to be solid precdent that the rule in Monk was compatible with Art 8. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm
Mrs Justice Rafferty noted the Croatian cases, and the observation of Cranston J in Coombes v Waltham Forest LBC [2010] EWHC 666 Admin that There is an obvious conflict between the Strasbourg jurisprudence and our own However, following Husband v Solihull MBC [2009] EWHC 3673 (Admin) and Wandsworth LBC v Dixon [2009] EWHC 27 [links to our reports], Qazi was held to be solid precdent that the rule in Monk was compatible with Art 8. [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 3:05 am
Coombe, 2009 U.S. [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:00 pm
Tawny and Emily Coombs Waddell will dive into this topic further on this week's HR Power Hour. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
From 27 to 29 November 2023, the FTT heard the trial in the case of Coombs v ICO and The Buckinghamshire Grammar Schools. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 7:20 am
In this week’s case (Coombs v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 12:33 pm
DWAYNE MAYO, Appellant, v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm
Lindsay, Roger Clarkeand Elizabeth Coombs, University of New South Wales, Faculty of Law, Salinger Privacy, University of Canberra, UTS: Law, Xamax Consultancy Pty Ltd and University of Malta Privacy Law’s False Promise, Washington University Law Review, Vol. 97, No. 3, 2019, Ari Ezra Waldman, New York Law School Carpenter v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 10:09 am
Coombs (1986) 179 Cal. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 6:46 am
Coombs (1986) 179 Cal. [read post]
