Search for: "Coombs v. Coombs"
Results 41 - 60
of 74
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2010, 11:29 am
Syndicate, The (West Springfield, MA) B&V Cab, Inc. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:41 am
" Coombs v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:51 pm
COOMBS, JR. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:03 am
Regina (Coombes) v Waltham Forest London Borough Council Queen’s Bench Division “Section 3 of the Protection from Eviction Act 1977 was not incompatible with article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:17 am
Third, amidst the usual welter of authorities being discussed, it was particularly interesting to see the Irish cases (Donegan v Dublin CC [2008] IEHC 288; Dublin CC v Gallagher [2008] IEHC 354) being drawn on in this context, although they are a bit of a sideshow. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:37 am
We have been aware of Coombes v LB Waltham Forest (Sec of State intervening) noted at [2010] All ER (D) 59 and on Lawtel, decided on 08.03.2010 in an extempore judgment (Cranston J), but waiting for the full transcript to be provided by the High Court. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:37 am
We have been aware of Coombes v LB Waltham Forest (Sec of State intervening) noted at [2010] All ER (D) 59 and on Lawtel, decided on 08.03.2010 in an extempore judgment (Cranston J), but waiting for the full transcript to be provided by the High Court. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 2:57 am
Regina (Coombes) v Waltham Forest London Borough Council and another [2010] WLR (D) 70 “S 3 of the Eviction Act 1977 was not incompatible with arts 6 and 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 8:33 am
As Judge Calabresi sees it, Chatin v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
First credit goes to HHJ Purle QC, sitting as a judge of the High Court, who has managed the seemingly impossible task of giving judgment in such a case without reference to any authority (beyond Yeoman's Row v Cobbe, but on the quantum meruit point), despite the case being redolent (at least) of the facts in Lloyds Bank v Rosset, Midland Bank v Cooke, Coombes v Smith, Cobbe (on the estoppel point), Stack v Dowden, Thorner v Major… [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
First credit goes to HHJ Purle QC, sitting as a judge of the High Court, who has managed the seemingly impossible task of giving judgment in such a case without reference to any authority (beyond Yeoman's Row v Cobbe, but on the quantum meruit point), despite the case being redolent (at least) of the facts in Lloyds Bank v Rosset, Midland Bank v Cooke, Coombes v Smith, Cobbe (on the estoppel point), Stack v Dowden, Thorner v Major… [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 1:28 pm
Danger, Will Robinson! [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 10:27 pm
Coombs, 2009 U.S. [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 3:05 am
Coombe, 2009 U.S. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 7:23 am
Importantly, the court did not disturb its earlier ruling in the case of Coombes v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 12:20 pm
In United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 9:58 am
Coombes v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:25 am
Sisters of the Sacred Heart of Mary Ltd and Others v Kingston upon Thames Borough Council Chancery Division “The introduction by Kingston upon Thames Borough Council of an unmanned code-operated barrier to control entry to Warren Road, a private road that provided access from a public road to the Coombe Estate, would amount to a substantial interference with the statutory rights of the Sisters of the Sacred Heart of Mary Ltd, Holy Cross Sisters Trustees Inc, Rokeby… [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 7:12 pm
In Coombs v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 11:30 pm
Supreme Court decision entitled Murray v. [read post]
