Search for: "Cooper v McInnes"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2017, 12:33 pm
York U – And All Eyes Over to York U for What's Next (Excess Copyright blog, July 14, 2017)The Federal Court of Canada Puts the “Fair” in the Copyright Act’s “Fair Dealing” Exceptions (McInnes Cooper analysis on CanLII Connects, July 18, 2017)Court Ruling on York's Copyright Infringements a Win for Canadian Creators (Macdonald-Laurier Institute, July 18, 2017)Students Deeply Concerned With Federal Court Ruling Against York… [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 3:09 pm
York U – And All Eyes Over to York U for What's Next (Excess Copyright blog, July 14, 2017)The Federal Court of Canada Puts the “Fair” in the Copyright Act’s “Fair Dealing” Exceptions (McInnes Cooper analysis on CanLII Connects, July 18, 2017)Court Ruling on York's Copyright Infringements a Win for Canadian Creators (Macdonald-Laurier Institute, July 18, 2017)Students Deeply Concerned With Federal Court Ruling Against York… [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 3:18 pm
”“This is not over yet, but the thousands of affected program members should take some comfort that every legal claim we advanced on their behalf has been approved to go forward,” said David Fraser of McInnes Cooper. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 10:03 am
” In Tupper v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 10:45 am
“It’s rare but it happens,” says McInnes Cooper’s Marc-Antoine Chiasson of last week’s Court of Queen’s Bench ruling in McCorkill v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:03 am
David TS Fraser practices internet and privacy law with the firm McInnes Cooper. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 3:42 pm
"As a result of Health Canada's error, we have already spoken with a number of people whose lives have been affected by this breach," said David Fraser, a national expert on privacy law, and McInnes Cooper's lead lawyer on this case. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am
On this particular question, the Chief Justice’s judgement in Grant v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
