Search for: "Cooper v. Metropolitan News Co., Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2022, 12:54 am by Frank Cranmer
In Department of Fair Employment and Housing v Cathy’s Creations Inc (CA Super Ct Oct 21, 2022) the court concluded that the Department had failed to prove intentional sexual orientation discrimination. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
Mike Nagata, senior vice president of CACI International Inc.; retired Lt. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Leiter also notes that, during the 1930s, the University of Chicago hired, as one of its new faculty members, a PhD in Philosophy even though he lacked a degree in law. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:49 pm by John Elwood
Sandoz, Inc., 13-854, scored an Opening Day win, which is more than we can say about the New York Metropolitans. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:39 am by Rob Robinson
§1920 – bit.ly/HewRoz (Mark Sidoti) PhotoCop & The Red Light of Admissibility - bit.ly/H18QVF (Josh Gilliland) Pippins v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
Agriculture & Nutrition, LLC, Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., and Olin Corporation. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
The Legal Aid Society; Real Estate Board of New York; New York State Tenants & Neighbors Coalition, Inc. et al.; Community Housing Improvement Program of New York Inc. et al.; Maria del Carmen Arroyo et al.; Rent Stabilization Association of New York City, Inc.; Office of Manhattan Borough President; Urban Justice Center; Mitchell-Lama Residents Coalition, amici curiae. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
: In re Kubin and KSR International Co v Teleflex Inc (Patent Docs)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: USPTO, Tafas & GSK request extension for reconsideration (IP Watchdog) CAFC: Patent on sex aid is obvious: Ritchie v Vast Resources (AKA Topco) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Assigning patent rights: Euclid Chemical v Vector Corrosion (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) District Court E D Michigan: LEDdynamics wins summary judgment in LED… [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:55 am
Co. (4th Dept., decided 2/6/2009) If you had read just the Fourth Department's "ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court" memorandum of February 6, 2009, you might have passed right over this case. [read post]