Search for: "Cooper v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 8,489
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2019, 10:17 am by Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP
After the district court remanded the cases back to state court, the cooperatives appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, who consolidated the three cases. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
  Following the publications complained of he felt compelled to, and did, make a formal announcement as to his true state of health both to the Board of the Company and to its workforce [43]. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:14 am by Isaac Gorodetski
United States on the issue of "whether federal immigration laws preclude Arizona's efforts at cooperative law enforcement and impliedly preempt four provisions of S.B. 1070 on their face. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 2:15 pm
State of Play V: Building the Global Metaverse (August 19-22, 2007) State of Play V: Building the Global Metaverse is the fifth annual State of Play conference on the future of virtual worlds. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 2:49 pm by Jules M. Haas
A recent decision by the Appellate Division, First Department, on February 11, 2016, in a case entitled Terzo v. 33 Fifth Avenue, provides a typical example of the difficulties encountered when an estate involves cooperative ownership. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:02 pm by Peter Moulinos
The Court, in Kikis v. 1045 Owners Corp., (NY Supreme Court Index #110936/09) ruled in favor of the cooperative board. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 1:42 pm by WIMS
The Appeals Court summarized the case saying, Universal Crop Protection Alliance, LLC, a formulator and distributor of a herbicide known as 2,4-D (or 2,4-D Amine), and its parent company, Universal Cooperatives (collectively, Universal), successfully defended a lawsuit brought by a group of cotton farmers in Arkansas state court for damages arising from off-target aerial application of the herbicide. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 10:15 am by Jon
However, the Court has held that the feds may not commandeer the cooperation of state agents, in Mack and Printz v. [read post]