Search for: "Corbett v. Department of Revenue"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2015, 10:04 am
R. v Fearon: Can Police Search a Cellphone upon Arrest? [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:01 am
In Quill Corp. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:01 am
” Three years later, in Back to the Internet Taxation Future, reacting to a reappearance of the proposal to permit state 1 to require retailers in state 2 with no state 1 connection to be taxed by state 1, I explained why progress had not been made, pointing out the inability of legislators and others to distinguish between sales and use taxes, the silliness of claims that internet retailers are not required to collect sales taxes at all for any state, the unwillingness of state legislatures… [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:01 am
Retailers bear the burden for sales tax collection, but that obligation is easy to enforce because it applies to in-state purchases and thus to retailers who are physically present in the state and whose in-state businesses are subject to a variety of regulations, including other business taxes, that bring their existence to the attention of the Department of Revenue. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 5:45 am
Talk about ungrateful–Judge Stanton, the BMI Rate Court judge was also the judge in Viacom v. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Corbett, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 670, at pp. 692-93. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 11:35 am
Michael, The Guardians of the New Internal Revenue Code, 25 Fla. [read post]
