Search for: "Corbin v. Corbin" Results 21 - 40 of 244
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2022, 12:11 pm by James Yu and Briyana Louis
We will continue to monitor this case and report on any important developments. [1] https://assets.law360news.com/1497000/1497541/order.pdf [2] Kanan, Corbin, Schupak & Aronow, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Their work burst the myth of legal objectivity by mercilessly exposing the political ideology of Lochner v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by ernst
Their work burst the myth of legal objectivity by mercilessly exposing the political ideology of Lochner v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 3:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiffs  in 286 Corbin Owners Corp. v Berger, 2022 NY Slip Op., 30018(U) January 3, 2022 Supreme Court, Kings County et Number: Index No. 513265/2020 Judge: Wavny Toussaint suffered storm damage from Sandy, and hired defendant attorneys to litigate. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Gostin, The Supreme Court, the Texas Abortion Law (SB8), and the Beginning of the End of Roe v Wade? [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Tushar, Evolution of Muslim Marriage Laws, (April 1, 2021).Nikos Koumoutzis, The Islamic Prohibition of Adoption as Limitation of the Right to Respect of Family Life (article 8 ECHR) – Revisiting ECtHR Harroudj v France, no. 43631/09, 4 October 2012, (Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional 1/2021).Moorthy S. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the law firm established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law through the submission of the transcript of Walker’s deposition testimony in the underlying action which showed that she could not identify the cause of her fall (see Colini v Stino, Inc., 186 AD3d 1610, 1611; Ash v City of New York, 109 AD3d 854, 856) and that, even if the law firm had breached its duty to the plaintiffs, they would not have prevailed in the underlying action… [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
Prometheus (Corbin Barthold, The Bulwark) Supreme Court Poised to Limit Computer Fraud Statute (Randall Eliason, Sidebars) Preview of Collins v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am by Andy Foreman
[ii] Smart contracts have already been used in connection with real estate transactions,[iii] bank bonds,[iv] interbank transfers,[v] invoice financing,[vi] and homeowners, renters, pet, and flight-delay insurance. [read post]