Search for: "Cordoba v. Holder"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2013, 11:28 am
I could be snarky and describe this morning's opinion by Judge Reinhardt as containing the following holding:Rich people are a protected class and so can get asylum in the United States.It'd be a pretty accurate description, too.But I'll do slightly more than that.Judge Reinhardt actually paints a pretty sympathetic picture of the plight of landholders in Mexico and, especially, Columbia. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
PatentsIn Takeda v Roche: "Is it plausible? [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:02 am
| Retromark Volume III: the last six months in trade marks | An IPSOC Q&A with Mr Justice Birss | The EU Commission proposes new whistle-blowing rules: should IP and trade secret holders tremble? [read post]
28 May 2018, 7:53 am
See more from IPKat on the Actavis v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:18 am
| Retromark Volume III: the last six months in trade marks | An IPSOC Q&A with Mr Justice Birss | The EU Commission proposes new whistle-blowing rules: should IP and trade secret holders tremble? [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 9:04 am
Things have changed and, nowadays, the images used are digital and the resulting school work/research is uploaded on freely accessible websites.This is indeed what happened in this case to a schoolgirl, who found an image of the city of Cordoba online and used it for an assignment for her Spanish class, providing acknowledgment of the website from which she had downloaded the photograph (though not of the photographer, because the website where the photograph appeared did not provide any). [read post]
