Search for: "Core v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 7,799
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2024, 7:34 pm
(ii) Development of Green Hydrogen Projects inside the Hubs in an integrated manner to allow pooling of resources and achievement of scale (iii) Enhance the cost-competitiveness of Green Hydrogen and its derivatives vis-a-vis fossil-based alternatives (iv) Maximize production of Green Hydrogen and its derivatives in India within the stated financial support (v) Encourage large-scale utilization and exports of Green Hydrogen and its derivatives (vi)… [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
Casto’s article Robert Jackson’s Critique of Trump v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 10:30 pm
Yet, the EU standard for legal anonymisation is still hotly debated, as illustrated by the recent case of SRB v EDPS now under appeal before the Court of Justice. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
” ENDNOTE [1] See Order, Lujan Claimants v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 12:31 pm
After the US Supreme Court released its opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 7:21 am
Carême v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 6:28 am
The core claim in their applications is that EPA did not sufficiently explain what might happen if one or more of the states covered by the regulatory program drops out—as has temporarily happened to 12 states due to judicial stays of separate EPA actions concerning those states. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:07 am
In Sibongelenn Radebe v The Aurum Institute (C662/2023) [2023] ZALCCT 66, the court reiterated that when determining urgency, it is critical that the applicant has within their founding affidavit established the background circumstances which make the matter urgent and the core reasoning why substantial relief cannot be attained within the normal prescribed time frame. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 7:24 am
” See United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:35 am
I’m pleased to write about the two cases again at the finale of their ten-year-long merits litigation odysseys (except in the unlikely event one or more losing defendant obtains leave to reargue or leave to appeal to the New York State Court of Appeals). [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 9:35 am
The First Amendment arguments in this case, Turner v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
The fundamental operative structure of the UNGP State duty to protect was grounded on the premise of international legality embedded within the principles of the state system. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 3:52 pm
From U.S. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 1:10 pm
As Justice Brandeis wrote in his canonical concurring opinion in Whitney v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 11:20 am
Hasemann v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
In Hunter v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am
Whilst the design of the proposed extension has changed since then (in a way which, ironically, attracts criticism from other objectors), the LPA informs me that its “core concerns” remain such that the proposals are “unlikely to gain planning permission” (9 November 2023) [7]. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 5:58 am
Carême v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 10:01 am
Gottlieb, Bush v. [read post]
