Search for: "Corell v. Corell" Results 21 - 40 of 61
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2007, 8:00 pm
COREL CORPORATION S132695 D043407 Dismissed - to CA 4/1 BIVENS v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:55 am
" As Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento points out, this is Bridgeman v. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 7:20 am by Just Security
General Assembly by Hans Corell (@CorellHans) Russia’s Eliminationist Rhetoric Against Ukraine: A Collection by Clara Apt (@claraapt25) U.S. / International Criminal Court Trust Fund Symposium  Introducing the Symposium on U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 7:27 pm by Ross
Related posts:Face to Face: Live Legal Tech Training v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 6:35 pm
COREL CORPORATION • S132695 • D043407 • Dismissed - to CA 4/1 BIVENS v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:31 pm by Andy
In contrast to this, in the US case of Bridgeman Art Library v Corel Corp [1999], the District Court of the Southern District of New York sought to apply UK law to the subject of photographs of classic works of art, and came to the opposite conclusion, namely that copyright did not subsist in mere photographic reproductions. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 5:30 am by Vishnu Kannan
Vishnu Kannan and Margaret Taylor summarized Friday’s oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 6:21 am by Florian Mueller
So far, the only tech company (besides Apple) that I've seen enforce a design patent is Microsoft (in its patent spat with Corel), and Microsoft may consider iOS the "lesser evil" among competing operating systems than Android. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 10:29 am
Corel Corp, where Bridgeman Art Library had taken several photographs of public domain paintings, which were copied by Corel and sold in a multimedia CD-ROM. [read post]