Search for: "Cork v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2012, 7:44 am
Damache v DPP [2012] IESC 11 centred on the constitutionality of s.29(1) of the Offences Against the State Act 1939, as amended by s.5 of the Criminal Law Act 1976. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
But there was no Swiss company “Crown Cork & Seal CO” registered at the address indicated in the notice of appeal, which was the correct address of the “Crown Cork AG” company. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 4:38 pm
We are delighted to welcome another guest post from Dr Conor O’Mahony, Lecturer in Constitutional Law at University College Cork. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 4:33 pm
We are delighted to welcome another guest post from Dr Conor O’Mahony, Lecturer in Constitutional Law at University College Cork. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 7:00 am
Click here to read Kilburn v Granite State (Tenn 2011) ".... the medical records show that on August 31, 2009, and November 2, 2009, Dr. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 12:18 pm
Anne is a PhD candidate at University College Cork. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 8:11 am
Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc., Individually and as Successor to Mundet Cork Corporation, Respondent. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Ricci v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 9:13 am
This much was made clear by the case of Byrne v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:37 pm
Levine, Corking the Cam Newton Loophole, a Sweeping Suggestion, 2 HARVARD JOURNAL OF SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT LAW 342 (2010) Nancy Hogshead-Makar, Hurricane warning flag for Olympic sports: compliance practices in Biediger v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
In NML Capital v Argentina, the question for the Supreme Court was whether one such investor, a New York fund that bought into Argentinian bonds which were subsequently defaulted, could enforce its judgment against assets of the Argentinian state in the United Kingdom. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:59 am
But everyone should keep the corks in the champagne. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:02 am
Furthermore, the GRAG draws support for the ECHR decision of Parry v UK to argue that it is within the margin of appreciation afforded to states on this issue to exclude married applicants from recognition. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:03 am
Crown, Cork & Seal v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
" Other footnotes omitted.The case is Robinson v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:32 am
Utah (1974) 414 U.S. 538 (American Pipe) and Crown, Cork & Seal Co., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 6:30 am
She discussed the available extras, including `pop the cork,’ which she explained was anal intercourse. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 9:05 pm
The recent decision of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal in the case of A.H. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
The High Court refused the application and distinguished the decision in DS v Judges of the Cork Circuit and the DPP [2008] 4 IR 379, noting that DS was concerned with successive jury disagreements after a complete trial, whereas in this case the jury was discharged each time following the evidence of the complainant. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 8:42 am
Thus, given the inquiry’s far-reaching impact on Callelly’s reputation, the case is clearly distinguishable from O’Malley v. [read post]
