Search for: "Corley v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 80
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2021, 5:34 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
It was made clear that Senate Republicans would not support the passage of the bill unless it included provisions to strengthen border security and deter illegal immigration into the United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 5:53 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
 This new decision could not have come at a better time as the United States prepares to jumpstart its economy amid the pandemic. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 6:19 am by Andrew Appel
Corley, 273 F.3d 429, 449 (2d Cir. 2001); see also United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 12:44 pm by Thomas O'Toole
The “foregone conclusion” doctrine was recently applied to the digital realm in United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  As of December 29, 2017, the Senate has confirmed including 19 Trump administration judicial nominees, including one Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, 12 judges for the United States Courts of Appeals, and six judges for the United States District Courts. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 12:39 pm by Andrew Crocker and Jamie Williams
” As a result, government mandates requiring people to speak are subject to strict scrutiny—the most stringent standard of judicial review in the United States. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 4:04 am by SHG
United States,  based on the need to stop whisky in cars, Harris Count deputies lawfully inserted their fingers in Charnesia Corley’s vagina on the side of the road. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am by Devlin Hartline
Staying with the context of antitrust law, take the example of FTC v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:38 am by Ronald Collins
Pamela Corley, Amy Steigerwalt, & Artemus Ward, The Puzzle of Unanimity: Consensus on the United States Supreme Court (Stanford Law Books, May 2013) Drawing on data from the U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 11:25 am by Eric
If SOPA had passed, undoubtedly we would have seen an increase in enforcement actions between two foreign litigants without real ties to the United States. [read post]