Search for: "Corporation v Levi" Results 101 - 120 of 617
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 8:34 am by WSLL
Because the right to subject corporate stock to levy and sale under execution is purely statutory, a levy which does not comply with the requirements of a state statute is invalid. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 5:31 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Umpqua Indian Development Corporation (Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Tort Claims) Tribal Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2017.htmlStone v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
O'Brien, 204 Ill App 3d 662, 672, 561 NE2d 1201, 1208; Corlett, Killian, Hardeman, McIntosh & Levi, P.A. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 11:45 am by Steve Baird
One of the current challenges in trademark law addressed in Seattle last week at the Amazon Corporate Conference Center, host of the 2017 McCarthy Institute and Microsoft Corporation Symposium, is an issue we have discussed quite a bit here, namely Trademark Disparagement and the First Amendment. [read post]
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 4:30 am by Karen Tani
From Chicago to Santiago: The Formation and Impact of the ‘Chicago Boys and Girls’Robert Van Horn, "Corporate Funders, Edward Levi, and the Rise of Chicago Law and Economics in the 1950s"Paul V. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 7:37 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court handed down its decision in South Dakota v. [read post]