Search for: "Corporation v. Gould" Results 41 - 60 of 107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2010, 6:47 am by Anna Christensen
Sentencing Law and Policy discusses the Court’s recent cert. grant in Gould v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
Stern School of Business New York University Ehud Kamar Professor of Law Gould School of Law University of Southern California Naveen Khanna AJ Pasant Endowed Chair Professor of Finance Broad College of Business Michigan State University Vikramaditya S. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 2:20 am by John Day
Walters, 276 S.C. 223, 226, 277 S.E.2d 888, 889 (1981) (finding an attorney liable for economic loss to a corporate shareholder when attorney breached a duty to the corporation); but see McCullough v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by Guest Author
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 1:59 pm by Ailyn Cabico
Written by Jay Gould and Michael Wu Pillsbury’s Investment Fund and Investment Management group recently submitted a comment letter to the North American Securities Administrator’s Association (the “NASAA”) on behalf of the private investment fund industry. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 9:45 am by Ted Tjaden
New 7th edition: Gould Estate v Stoddart Publishing Co (1998), 39 OR (3d) 545 (CA) [i.e., no periods after the "v" or after "Co" or for the abbreviations for the Ontario Reports Court of Appeal] Former: Canada Business Corporations Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 1:12 am
Gould KINGS COUNTY Real Property Unsubstantiated Denial of Service Does Not Rebut Presumption of Valid Service on Secretary of State West Coast Realty Services Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 8:35 am by Jon Sands
Burgam, No. 09-50449 (1-25-11) (Fisher with Gould; dissent by O'Scannlain). [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 2:45 am
That meant that a large corporation, like Jay Gould's railroad company, could lobby a state legislature for special laws and attack state railroad regulations and taxes on the grounds that they were in violation of the 14th Amendment.The opponents of special interests and railroads were the Populists, a political party that was prevalent in Western States like Nebraska and Colorado. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 6:16 am
Bank, University of California, Los Angeles, on Thursday, August 18, 2016 Tags: Boards of Directors, Compensation guidelines, Compensation ratios, Corporate culture, Executive Compensation,Labor markets, Management, Taxation Political Contributions and Lobbying Proposals Posted by Yafit Cohn, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Thursday, August 18, 2016 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm by Sri Medicherla
Packert Trustee Chair in Law at the University of Southern California Gould School of Law, discussed how the Sackett v. [read post]