Search for: "Corrigan v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 70
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2009, 7:05 am
  The general theme of the dissents was that additional briefing and argument was necessary to consider the implications of the United States Supreme Court decision of Caperton v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Rubin eloquently articulated that employees are powerless to effect change in the workplace on an individual level, reinforcing the public policy of the United States to allow employees to organize and act in concert. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Andrew Pincus, amicus for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States, finished up Respondent’s argument by first addressing Justice Liu’s question regarding a modified Gentry rule. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:25 am
Gardner v Broderick, 392 US 273 and People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326 discuss the parameters of immunity in connection with compelling a public officer or employee to answer questions concerning his or her performance of official duties.If, however, an individual fails to answer questions truthfully where he or she has use or transactional immunity, such immunity does not prevent the fact that he or she answered falsely from being used against the individual if he or she is… [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 4:29 am by jonathanturley
On December 30, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit handed down a major opinion in in Adams v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 7:12 am by Brian Shiffrin
This right "'must be scrupulously protected'"(People v Smith , 87 NY2d 715, 721 [1996], quoting People v Corrigan , 80 NY2d 326, 332 [1992]). [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 9:38 am by Brian A. Comer
On June 21, 2013, a jury returned a defense verdict in a rollover case tried in United States District Court, Aiken Division. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 4:08 am
" Other cases addressing use immunity include Gardner v Broderick, 392 US 273 and People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm by Patrick M. Corrigan
United States supports the binary view of administrative agencies, separating executive agencies from those agencies that “require absolute freedom from Executive interference. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:42 pm by Steven G. Pearl
Interestingly, the Supreme Court of the United States seems poised to reach the same result in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 4:10 am
" [Motion to appeal denied, 93 N.Y.2d 803.]Howevere, in the event an individual fails to answer questions truthfully where he or she has use or transactional immunity, such immunity does not prevent any false answer the individual might give the investigator from being used against the individual if he or she is subsequently charged with perjury [United States v Apfelbaum, 445 US 115].The Ali decision is posted on the Internet at:[archive.citylaw.org] [read post]