Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 1 - 20
of 48,934
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2010, 10:11 pm
The big costs cases of recent years have almost all found their way to at least the Court of Appeal (eg Callery v Gray [2001] EWCA Civ 1117, Hollins v Russell [2003] EWCA Civ 718, Claims Direct Test Cases [2003] EWCA Civ 136, Myatt v National Coal Board [2006] EWCA Civ 1017, etc). [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 9:27 pm
The following comes from the Association of Law Costs Draftmen's council: This is the collective response of the council of the ALCD to the posts made in response to the article Costs Counsel v Costs Lawyer [click link]. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 10:38 pm
A recent post discussed the Court of Appeal’s decision in Tasleem v Beverley [2013] EWCA Civ 1805 and apparent suggestion (flying in the face of an earlier Court of Appeal decision) that issuing Part 8 costs-only proceedings was not part of the detailed assessment proceedings (with the apparent consequence that such costs would fall outside […] [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 11:59 am
The post Keezio v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 11:59 am
The post Keezio v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:06 am
Master Hurst has ruled in Motto & Others v Trafigura (SCCO, 29/06/2011) (click for judgment) that in a CFA funded case interest on costs should not begin to run until costs have been assessed, rather than the earlier date when judgment is given. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 9:53 pm
Our latest Costs Law Update on the important decision in BNM v MGN Limited [2016] EWHC B13 (Costs), where a “reasonable” bill was “slashed” by 50% on the basis of the new proportionality test is now available. [read post]
11 May 2013, 1:38 pm
2518 (S.C.) and Field v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 10:37 pm
Bernard in Stanton v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 9:16 pm
The poor costs draftsman barely got a word in edgeways. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:32 pm
The Association of Costs Lawyers' new special adviser Dominic Regan, writing in the New Law Journal, discussed the case of Howell v Lees-Millais [2011] EWCA Civ 786. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 12:40 pm
: Janus v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 3:43 pm
It costs to win, it costs to loseNorthstar, Seaquest and Ultraframe v Fielding , which you can read here on BAILII, just keeps coming back to court again and again. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 9:42 pm
Excluding the costs of drafting the bill, the defendant would have won comfortably on the offer (see Forward v Burton [2005] EWHC 90003 (Costs)). [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 10:43 pm
Costs webinar from Kings Chambers’ Matthew Smith and Paul Hughes discussing how the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Kenig v Thomson Snell and Passmore LLP [2024] EWCA Civ 15 affects the way that solicitors ought to perform retainers dealing with the administration of estates and the likelihood and course of assessment of their […] The post Costs webinar on Kenig v Thomson Snell and Passmore LLP first appeared on Legal Costs Specialists -… [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:14 am
Valentino U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 10:02 pm
It has been suggested that in the case of Stocker v Stocker [2015] EWHC 1634 the most interesting observation by Mr Justice Warby was: “I readily acknowledge the importance of ensuring that the costs budgeting process does not result in … Continue reading → [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:44 am
[18] FAR 31.201-6(e)(2); see also Raytheon Co. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:08 pm
One aspect of the preliminary issues judgment in Motto & Ors v Trafigura Ltd & Anor [2011] EWHC 90201 (Costs) (15 February 2011) that I did not quite understand concerned the cost of security. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 10:59 am
This Cost Corner focuses on the allocation of direct and indirect costs. [read post]
