Search for: "Cost v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 31,386
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2020, 1:46 pm
In State v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 9:27 pm
The following comes from the Association of Law Costs Draftmen's council: This is the collective response of the council of the ALCD to the posts made in response to the article Costs Counsel v Costs Lawyer [click link]. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:12 am
STATE V. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:39 pm
In AEI Ltd v Phonographic Performance Limited [1999] 1 WLR 1507, Lord Woolf MR stated: “…it is no longer necessary for a party to have acted unreasonably or improperly to be deprived of his costs of a particular issue on which he has failed. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 9:05 pm
is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 9:22 pm
While this is a time of great political uncertainty in the United States, the next President has a promising opportunity to advance dramatically what has been called the cost-benefit state. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:55 pm
Via Ashkan Soltani: ”The Yale Law Journal Online (YLJO) just published an article that Ashkan Soltani co-authored with Kevin Bankston (first workshopped at the Privacy Law Scholars Conference last year) entitled Tiny Constables and the Cost of Surveillance: Making Cents Out of United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2018, 7:11 am
is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 12:35 am
In the case of Research in Motion UK Ltd v Visto Corporation [2008] EWHC 3026 (Pat) he stated:"the traditional approach to costs control of litigation in this country, which is after the event by way of an assessment of costs which limits the amount that can be recovered by the receiving party from the paying party, is inadequate and unsatisfactory. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 6:44 pm
In Mazur v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 8:00 am
Here: Susanville v US Complaint An excerpt: This is a suit against the United States for breach of contract and statute by the Indian Health Service (“IHS”), an agency in the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”). [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s opinion in Michigan v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 11:28 am
By Erica Shelley Nelson and Brennen Johnson In Moore v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 8:58 am
State of Arizona v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 2:14 am
AL (Albania) v Secretary for State the Home Department; FN (Gambia) v Same; DN(Bangladesh) v Same: [2012] EWCA Civ 710; [2012] WLR (D) 16 “In statutory appeals to the Court of Appeal from the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber), if the appeal had been allowed by consent, with the appellant obtaining the remittal sought, or if the appeal had been resolved by the grant of a status which was not previously offered, then provided… [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 9:28 am
Supreme Court ruling in Olmstead v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 11:17 am
In Sykes v. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 2:16 am
Wallace Brucker v. [read post]
