Search for: "Cost v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 31,382
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2018, 11:31 am
State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 9:02 am
& Gas Corp. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2006, 2:07 pm
")Trials on a bus cost the administrative state very little; and the administrators are winning. [read post]
31 Aug 2013, 2:26 pm
In State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 10:46 am
Parker, R (On the Application Of) v Bashir & Anor (2022) EWHC 358 (Admin) A judicial review of a Magistrates Court decision on costs in a section 82 Environmental Protection Act 1990 prosecution. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 3:37 am
Champion v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 3:00 pm
As discussed in our March 13 post, the California Supreme Court issued its much awaited decision in State of California v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 6:05 am
Tex. 2012) (awarding costs for expert witness fees); Neves v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 5:47 am
Law professors and commentators have focused generally on the legal aspects of the Supreme Court deadlock in United States v, Texas. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am
”[12] Importantly, there is no presumption of cost reasonableness.[13] If an initial review of the facts results in the Government challenging a specific cost, the contractor has the burden to prove that the cost is reasonable.[14] The FAR provides that whether a cost is reasonable depends on a “variety of considerations and circumstances,” including the following: Whether it is the type of cost generally recognized as ordinary and… [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 10:16 am
SCOTUSblog deserves considerable thanks for putting together this symposium about United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 3:30 am
Continue reading "The Costs of Privacy"The post The Costs of Privacy appeared first on Jotwell. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 7:52 am
In the threshold motion in Maxwell v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:54 pm
” • In the case of Shirely v Caswell [2001] 1 Costs LR 1, Chadwick, LJ, giving the judgment of the Court of Appeal, stated: “The costs of issues abandoned, or not pursued at trial, ought, prima facie, to be disallowed against the party incurring them on an assessment of the costs of that party by the costs judge - because, again prima facie, they are costs which have been unnecessarily incurred in the litigation. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
In 2018, in the case of Mattina v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
In 2018, in the case of Mattina v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 5:19 am
In her paper, Professor Lampley discusses the methods a court may utilize to examine the potentially prohibitive costs associated with pursing individual arbitration following recent United States Supreme Court precedent in American Express Co. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:33 am
The United States Supreme Court has held that attorneys’ fees are recoverable as costs under The Civil Rights Attorney’s Fees Awards Act of 1976[xxxi]and the Eleventh Circuit has held that fees are recoverable as costs under The Copyright Act. [read post]
5 May 2017, 7:51 am
Perhaps one of the most important eminent domain cases in recent years was Kelo v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:13 pm
However, the judgment itself, in turn, refers to the case of Brierley v Prescott [2006] EWHC 90062 (Costs). [read post]