Search for: "Cotton v. Doe" Results 41 - 60 of 354
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2022, 9:20 pm by News Desk
Supreme Court is not taking the appeal of Edwin Hardeman v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:50 pm
In contrast, the Court of Appeals recently held in Cotton v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 12:32 pm by WIMS
Id Although the Sixth Circuit later adopted the interpretation advanced by the Administrator, Nat'l Cotton Council of Am. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am by Stephanie Zable
Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution prohibits “Bill[s] of Attainder,” laws that, under Supreme Court precedent, “legislatively determine[] guilt and inflict[] punishment upon an identifiable individual without provision of the protections of a judicial trial” (Nixon v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 3:56 am by SHG
  That's what Shelby County Circuit Judge Hub Harrington found in Burdette v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 4:54 pm
They are fibrous felts, like cotton. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm
Those cotton-tipped swabs aren't labeled for removing ear wax.Physicians are permitted to make off-label use of drugs and devices and, to our eyes, off-label use does not affect the preemption analysis.First, Riegel v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 9:01 am by Don Cruse
VENTURE COTTON COOPERATIVE AND NOBLE AMERICAS CORP. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 1:14 am by Afro Leo
The document suggests the RSA does not have the capacity to manufacture drugs (p 23)."" [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 1:48 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
While Griffin concluded that neither statutory provision provided for jurisdiction, he nonetheless concluded that the court was obligated to conclude that there is jurisdiction under § 1369(b)(1)(F) given the 6th Circuit’s decision in National Cotton Council of America v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 10:06 am by Buce
Of course these were the same guys who used to kidnap their neighbors and sell them as slaves to chop cotton in Iran. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 10:55 am
The case was identified in the Sixth Circuit as National Cotton Council v. [read post]